there has been allot of shit going on in the last while; russia is militarizing. muslims on the extreme side are attempting to return the caliphate and conquer the west. feminism is trying to break down intergender relations and create resentment sufficient to empower distinct gender dialects.
i've been working on a journalism rework, which would replace journalism and the press as an institution, effectively create more insular cultures. but with the way some people are behaving- it has me worried. large portions of these people aren't capable of being civil and to have access to such a tool would just give them the mechanical advantage to geometricly spread out the harm they cause in selfish attempt to pollitik. they don't have the skills to produce, or the tallent to coerce, so they use violence and extort.
mutual extortion is nearly ubiquitous. where people do things to avoid the consequences of not doing them, or in attempt to gain favorable consequence. but there are all these groups of criminals who work with others to exploit the weakness of a third party, treating the third party like game to hunt. they have attitudes like "there are no bad methods, only bad targets". and presupposition that their opinion bespeaks their demographic and so something 'is offensive' instead of 'offending me'. or 'it is against my group' instead of 'it is against me'.
this ethnocentrism is toxic. because there are large portions of toxic people attempting to pollitic their way in and through all demographics, they target new ones which lack resistance and immunities, and they swell in ones which reinforce the behavior.
civil discussion is breaking because the things driving lexical shift, aren't acceptable at such a large demographic pool. and when people get rejected from one group entirely instead of reforming or dying they make a new one, with blackjack and hookers. meaning there is no point in them trying to change to rejoin the previous group. and this gets very worrisome when a group which is laughed out of culture, starts getting institutionalized power. covert misappropriation through the anonymity created by having a diverse and populous number of functionally interchangeable persons.
they are angry and vengeful apostates. and while getting them to have their alternative culture seems to be a bandage on the wound. the would seems to me atm too deep for mere bandage. because their alternative culture will just continue to polarize through faulty socialization, instead of giving a community which is an individual in a community of communities. if they do try to return to the community of communities, they often will find the general group to be as uncanny as the general group finds the minority, but the minority will have adapted in isolation and often will have a memetic virus to come back against the community of communities. whether the abuse is by violent extortion, denial of human rights, or intentional allienation to try to cause empathy through perceived reciprocity- doing to the bad people what you experianced as they did to you.
it pains me, but for full disclosure. even i'm ridiculously angry over the french reporters. i'm angry about feminism trying to imperialize games culture. and i'm angry about the abuse of law and language by assholes trying to politik dishonestly.
you see games culture was one of those minority groups which was for people feeling alienated out of the mainstream. and feminism went after the mainstream, once conquered they turned on to similar alienated and marginalized minorities like the NAACP, and the atheists. and now they are attempting to appropriate us while being outsiders. they kicked us out of their playhouse, and we built our own, and now that theirs is trashed they want in ours. they feel entitled to ours, but not responsible to play by our rules and customs. beyond that, they wouldn't accept let alone respect the customs, because they felt self entitled to be arbiters over other's behavior.
they weren't content with domineering unfairly over general culture, they had to invade and colonize the outliers. and it is the same for the muslims trying to get sharia in the west. and sadly it is the same kind of mentality of condescending westerners who want other groups to become the west (like some feminists), despite those foreign places being as foreign to us as we are to them. and that is the isolationist point. the only thing they must let us be is ourselves.
they must let us interpret and consider and discuss our experiences amongst ourselves. getting criticism only when requested. we should not grow up as a culture as that vilifies the ignorance of childhood. we should not pander to domestic groups because that inherently polarizes and creates hostilities with the group which oppose them. and we should neither project alien demands on external groups, nor let them project their will on us. and we need to do this because complicit participation in exploitative circumstance is aiding and abetting the circumstance. presuming the validity of democracy even when the group being oppressed by the rule was previously exiled from the cultural privilege of representation and inclusion, is invalid. you don't get to domineer something when it becomes successful, a pack of wolves will always choose the sheep.
...
at a meta level, this links back to a journalism service. i'm not sure about the ethics involved.
