from isolationism and castle doctrine to anti-imperialism

there has been allot of shit going on in the last while; russia is militarizing. muslims on the extreme side are attempting to return the caliphate and conquer the west. feminism is trying to break down intergender relations and create resentment sufficient to empower distinct gender dialects.

i've been working on a journalism rework, which would replace journalism and the press as an institution, effectively create more insular cultures. but with the way some people are behaving- it has me worried. large portions of these people aren't capable of being civil and to have access to such a tool would just give them the mechanical advantage to geometricly spread out the harm they cause in selfish attempt to pollitik. they don't have the skills to produce, or the tallent to coerce, so they use violence and extort.

mutual extortion is nearly ubiquitous. where people do things to avoid the consequences of not doing them, or in attempt to gain favorable consequence. but there are all these groups of criminals who work with others to exploit the weakness of a third party, treating the third party like game to hunt. they have attitudes like "there are no bad methods, only bad targets". and presupposition that their opinion bespeaks their demographic and so something 'is offensive' instead of 'offending me'. or 'it is against my group' instead of 'it is against me'.

this ethnocentrism is toxic. because there are large portions of toxic people attempting to pollitic their way in and through all demographics, they target new ones which lack resistance and immunities, and they swell in ones which reinforce the behavior.

civil discussion is breaking because the things driving lexical shift, aren't acceptable at such a large demographic pool. and when people get rejected from one group entirely instead of reforming or dying they make a new one, with blackjack and hookers. meaning there is no point in them trying to change to rejoin the previous group. and this gets very worrisome when a group which is laughed out of culture, starts getting institutionalized power. covert misappropriation through the anonymity created by having a diverse and populous number of functionally interchangeable persons.

they are angry and vengeful apostates. and while getting them to have their alternative culture seems to be a bandage on the wound. the would seems to me atm too deep for mere bandage. because their alternative culture will just continue to polarize through faulty socialization, instead of giving a community which is an individual in a community of communities. if they do try to return to the community of communities, they often will find the general group to be as uncanny as the general group finds the minority, but the minority will have adapted in isolation and often will have a memetic virus to come back against the community of communities. whether the abuse is by violent extortion, denial of human rights, or intentional allienation to try to cause empathy through perceived reciprocity- doing to the bad people what you experianced as they did to you.

it pains me, but for full disclosure. even i'm ridiculously angry over the french reporters. i'm angry about  feminism trying to imperialize games culture. and i'm angry about the abuse of law and language by assholes trying to politik dishonestly.

you see games culture was one of those minority groups which was for people feeling alienated out of the mainstream. and feminism went after the mainstream, once conquered they turned on to similar alienated and marginalized minorities like the NAACP, and the atheists. and now they are attempting to appropriate us while being outsiders. they kicked us out of their playhouse, and we built our own, and now that theirs is trashed they want in ours. they feel entitled to ours, but not responsible to play by our rules and customs. beyond that, they wouldn't accept let alone respect the customs, because they felt self entitled to be arbiters over other's behavior.

they weren't content with domineering unfairly over general culture, they had to invade and colonize the outliers. and it is the same for the muslims trying to get sharia in the west. and sadly it is the same kind of mentality of condescending westerners who want other groups to become the west (like some feminists), despite those foreign places being as foreign to us as we are to them. and that is the isolationist point. the only thing they must let us be is ourselves.

they must let us interpret and consider and discuss our experiences amongst ourselves. getting criticism only when requested. we should not grow up as a culture as that vilifies the ignorance of childhood. we should not pander to domestic groups because that inherently polarizes and creates hostilities with the group which oppose them. and we should neither project alien demands on external groups, nor let them project their will on us. and we need to do this because complicit participation in exploitative circumstance is aiding and abetting the circumstance. presuming the validity of democracy even when the group being oppressed by the rule was previously exiled from the cultural privilege of representation and inclusion, is invalid. you don't get to domineer something when it becomes successful, a pack of wolves will always choose the sheep.

...
at a meta level, this links back to a journalism service. i'm not sure about the ethics involved.

mathematical sex and orientation

natural number unary
0 = 0; _ =_
1 = 1
11 =  2
111 = 3
...

 logarithmic number scale (binary)
0 = 0
1 = 1
10 = 2
11 = 3
... and trinary for comparison  (still a log system)
0
1
2
10
11
... (the most common log scale people use is base 10)

as you may see however there is a bit of a vestigial simplification from the reasoning of nothing as being a type of value causing the unary (the first set) to have a divergent use of a non-unary value; no multiple of one can equal 0, and the passive lack can only indicate nill/null not none.

if we enter into the log scales we can see quickly that there is an arbitrary limit of how complex one "place" can get before needing another one to maintain precision. you can grow the base itself, but still will have limited capacity, beyond which it can't grow without expansion. now people may argue implicit associations, that there is more nothing than something because the value 1 has infinite 0 before it and that implicitly geometricly expands even as the unary or log system gradually ads more meaning.

from this natural number base, we often expand into integers (math sense) we add prefix of paradigm presumption ascribing with greater certainty the value of the number, generally as either + or -. but what is the difference of + and - 0?

symbolically:
0 = female
1 = male
what if we add into/onto that gender and orientation?

well we are already familiar with + and - as being both processes and attributes and them associating with non-zero numbers. but what happens if we use them on zero?

the answer is 'almost everything'. what is the opposite of nothing? what is not nothing? everything. and from here we get a simple way to introduce a variety of concepts:

• zero/nothing
• something/variable  (binning/circumscribing)
• infinity/everything

also it allows an ideological inversion later for variable oriented math rather than number based math. allowing abdication of the arithmetic focus. as well as a tying of both the abstract and litteral ways brains deal with counting.

you have:

+0 as the normal 0 value

-0 as both adding nothing in a specifically negative way, but also an inversion of the integer sequence. this inversion make -0 create a number series in the opposite direction or the + or natural number sequence.

but also there is the 'true' imaginary sequence which shifts the binary to trinary and imaginary 0 (io) indicates a certain or circumscribe-able yet unknown value; literally a variable.

...

so how does this orientation relate to sex?

it relates in taht now you have incremental inversion steps to remove ambiguity.

in unary, you had almost no use for one of the primal evaluative states. you had nothing, but it was logically dissimilar to the numbers either through paradoxal implicit lack, or explicit lack and logical dissonance due to multiple numeric bases.

in log numbers, you have 0 as lack. it is a number representing the unity of integers adn the creation of higher orders; representing active cyclical patterns within that numeric base. whenever you have a specific base - 1 value and it gets incremented to or beyond the base it pops up in the delta-signicance; two digits become one or vice versa.

but now in an abstract manner you are reorienting for the perception of plus-or-minus 0 as always nothing, to 0 as infinity (or the limit of infinity) and thus a holistic decadent dep-iary (negative oriented looping) paradigm to be contrasted with an additive paradigm.

it is pushed further still, by adding in a class of objective variables into the main number sequence itself. ignorance isn't 

masculine (arithmetic or process) vs feminine (ends orientation)

6+7 = 13 vs Q - O = X

it shifts the mind back and forth between the two approaches of dealing with numbers so even if you primarily use log math, you can still see the limitless variables underneath and you can deal with an analyze the relaitonship of the variables while avoiding much of the arithmetic.

and it is all about focusing on the measurement algebraicaly over the unit representation. combining the unary five litteral apples, with the algebraic adjective '5' apples to create a simple, powerful, and abstract, as it is merely drawing a circle around the things to be counted.

the feminine (compass shaped) variable base is simply the hand positions representing teh order the variables are creating. n,s,e,w,se,nw,ne,sw. +0 and -0 can also be shown Θ (theta) vs )-( or Φ (both characters strike through the circle significantly), the last dichotomy is · vs O.  the way the feminine form is ordered is 0,n,s,e,w,se,nw,ne,sw, )-( with no capacity for unary style expansion, but rather adding proceedingly smaller hands to the compass face, like a clock. these numbers are pointers, pointing to some type of limit, theta and phi as 0 and infinity but with the compass faces specific 'bones' signifying the order of creation of object or class they belong. when there are multiple hands the largest one is the parent class

you probably use the feminine base like degrees. so you have the compass shape and then a integer. instead of x = 173 you have Q173 or Q (which is south east) is 173.

society and slut shaming

(intro)
this is kinda relating to my major problem with english as a language. because english isn't logically/analyically constructed there is no facsimile of continuity and many words with similar themes/meanings are phonetically very different. arguably, they are so different that allot of objective meaning oriented word families are hidden.

(begining)

'who are society?' expresses one paradigm, emphasis being not on society but 'are'. i'd say 'who is society?' or 'what is society?'

and there, though vague, is a huge difference of paradigm. 'who are (our) society' means that there is a plurality of personhood, and that sample size is relevant because you are deriving straight from sample rather than averaging (logically generalizing, as opposed to anecdotal hyperbole); which you also kinda argue against in this entry as juvenile. the fragmented sense as shown either by adding 'our', or changing 'are' to 'is', can express a more limited and precise meaning.

imho, roughly society's opinion is the modal opinion of one's social environment. the scope of the social environment is unspecified. 

society could be your friends, your teacher/family/church, your city, or even the media which attempts to tie empires of many cultures together. put another way, it is the fuzzy-logic form of "man's opinion" and the problem people have with the term often arises with the presumed scope/generality of the group/speaker. young people, especially those in 'playgrounds' may have a very different but equally genuine perception of the limit's of their social interaction. to them society might be hypocritical soccer moms, underpaid and understaffed teachers, and a bunch of peers groups by age more than capacity, culture, or interests.

it is the collective and general response of what you perceive a people are telling you to do. society's dictate is the interpretation of all the most general opinions projected upon you; creating the ethos/role you feel pressured to be. which going back to the playground icon, if you aren't grouped with people of similar convictions, chances are you will be offended by irreverence to your values/premise, even by minority circumstance. especially during a time when identity and role are fluid, and one is really seeking comradery/companionship due to intense hormones.

...

"society is in a rapid rate of moral decay" is dissonance of national identity (law/morality confusion) vs religious.

 things like the general 'society tells victims not to be abused, rather bad people not to abuse' can be a genuine perception though tacitly false. the only way i think we can possibly engage with it though is to request further analysis. "how do you know they are bad people, if you aren't told that the behavior is unacceptable? wouldn't they seem to be 'good' people despite their wrongs if the behavior was tolerable?" the value to this approach imho, is that there still may be some people who are brought up in environments where there is a 'hate the sin not the sinner attitude', and if the wrong/harm a person committed was mitigated by greater societal 'conspiracy' the person may need to feel the victimized state to move on beyond it; forsaking that acrid environment.

the comment about necessity of society teaching "don't get raped" is valid, but ironically i think it needs to be taught to women to make sure they are aware the lesson is out there. it is a matter of not teaching a lesson, but most people have the relevant audience in this instance backwards; and most things backwards in general.

but again the issue lies in how vague and open to perception ambiguous words are even with (perhaps sufficient) grammar.

people will abuse 'society' through anecdote the same way many abuse 'they' as a genderless (or bi gender) singular.

...

the way 'don't get raped' is vallid is that it is a double negative. but the oversight is that you don't want a double negative if things are shitty, you want another negative to cancel it out. you want to rebuke it. and if forced to use bad methodology/reasoning you need to make it so your change still subjects the (self) injured to the placebo, even if it does nothing to anyone else.

 making people think you are doing something, may have better impact than abusing demographics in profiling to charge innocent people with crimes; which just inters the wrong.
...

most people who are against slut shaming don't even know why they fuck they are shamed most of the time and just project outwards so here is the thing.

being a slut can merely mean a girl is promiscuous and socially this is a mild negative. the hate and rancor comes out not from slutty actions but from cheating, especially cheating and they crying rape to escape responsibility for one's choices.

fiscal morality and homelessness

how to increase the social value of the homeless:

• buy an apartment complex or design a military (submarine) style barracks:
•  perhaps instead design a tokyo single room tube hotel style; array. making the whole of the bunk a safe.
• honeycomb, crawl in style
• put within the barracks, a safe with key for every bunk (irrelevant if entire bunk is the safe)
• allow withdrawals from registered bank to only be made once the key is returned
• legislate that the nearest bank to a homeless complex has to wave account creation fees and minimum deposits for an account, and check deposit services, and for personal financial counseling.
• documentation of a fiscally responsible identity, recognized by civil and criminal institutions.
• 'proof of' address (for law enforcement)
• registered place of employment, and banks are required to have the capacity to record salary. 
• empower the caretaker of the homeless complex to grant bus transportation passes.
• give free food for the homeless in a cafeteria style eatery; bulk food, perhaps donated.
• vegan + bread + water + various types of oil menu...
• group showers - water valves can be adjusted to only give hot water during certain hour ranges.
• assign a police group to have jurisdiction over the complex with both significant camera coverage and lighting.

basically increase the value we grant the homeless above the value in terms of spending we place on criminals.

the requested approach:

• creates jobs & manpower,
• increases quality and sanctity of life
• more tax revenue, with the program being self sufficient through taxation.
• reduces manpower loss based on fiscal issues (if someone is misfortunate enough to lose a house, they still have a level to fall back on without the costs for all associated with turnover from loss of a job),
• homeless families don't negatively influence children as significantly (reducing criminal activity),
• reduces or eliminates criminal panhandling, by socializing most everything necessary to make panhandling nearly redundant.
• reduces labor fluctuations during winter months of more dire need because impromptu shelters wouldn't have to be set up if there already is relevant/sufficient infrastructure. 

enlightenment and secular death.

as some are aware there have been several enlightenments before 'western' culture's recent industrial revolution. the muslims had a immeasurable progress through the creation of elementary versions of natural selection, and moderate versions of al'jabr (now called algebra), amoung other less celebrated accomplishments. the greeks before them came up with aqueducts, geometry, and elementary steam power. earlier still there were aggricultural revolution(s) which changed the political and structural landscape to quite notable degrees. but when we think of the enlightenment it is the western boom, now coming to an end.

what was it about the various booms which created the amazing growth of industry, and how do the mistakes made effect the fruition of progress?

i believe the cultures began to plummet, when they got too proud to learn. the greeks and the muslims, like americans today, were vicariously proud of the accomplishments of their people. and they laid claim to knowledge unearned. they were educated to a degree by the learned, but proud rather than humbled by what they acquired/learned which wasn't dependent on their own labor. all due to the lack of arduous trial. i believe this was the cause due to the implications and cross pollination of pride making other view of less substance, more fertile. so by reaping the harvest of the society through cooperation lives were extended, and with them the fallacious views they portend.

in doing this they forgot their place, and the majority's leadership crumbled under the weight of the dogmatic zionism. right at the place where majority rule meets minority rights, the wrong minorities of more traditional fervor were the ones granted preference.

without fixing how we evaluate voting and merit, our secular society will likely choose the wrong parties for guidance. which will kill the blip of civility.

how should we handle power?

nonprofit insurance & inverted loans

the way insurance companies are run, there is a lot of bias on the grounds of risk, as well as on the grounds of profit. what if the grounds of profit were removed to a principle-percentile fee with additional costs solely for inflation?

should insurance companies be based on selling help upon a rainy day through the creation of fear, or provide the groundwork for abating the rainy day?

socialized networking creating gamified pseudo unions.

here is how it would work:

• insurance companies take monthly payments based upon a risk adjusted cost to consumer. the worse credit, and more destructive tendencies increase the payment so that for every expense, there is excess money coming in to cover it.
• because of the very top heavy nature of the business plan, the first payment(s) are non-refundable fees towards the creation of account in the system, and are the effective replacement for the per-month profit.
• limit the amount invested monthly into the nonprofit account to be logarithmic decay, this also filters out people who can't make the payments, all by making the first several payments large, and then taper off. part of the tapering off is a how long the person wants to pay to hit the limit.
• create a social game of a network which allows people to choose members (or groups) to 'reduce' their personal risk by 'blending' it with others. this creates an easier approach to corporate rates, as well as for unions, political movements, groups of friends, and families to offset the risk or cost   without lowering the affected credit gain.

what this in effect accomplishes is a sum or amalgamation of debt, natural social distribution of risk, and a limit to how much people "prepay for their loan". for example in health insurance the premiums are quite high even when you don't need anything, even when your demographic is one of the lowest risk groups. making it so people can talk about and share their hobbies while also backdoor analysising their  personal risk further through their personal disclosure. you can demarcate much higher risk people from the much lower risk. 

so men are 6% more risky than women? well if people are going to incur risk based on non-choice accounts they should also incur risk for things they truely love to do, and the communities for that activity should be the ones willing to foot the bill to some small degree. for example, if a company deals with the outdoors they should be able to donate a part of their profits for/to those negatively affected by the exercise of freedom. they could choose to donate for a capitalist warranty program, or they could choose to donate to offset medical or emergency costs for healthcare events which involve their market's major interest. this offsets immediate costs/risk for those doing the activity. also derivative products of safety certification (like driver's license for health care and car insurance) could be sold to businesses to reduce the risk associated with the concern.

all in all this allows people to:

•  save their money safely, and effectively, while designating it for purpose
• divert the total magnanamy of risk to the greater community, 
• locate and store large amounts of funds for anti-inflation investing in related public works reducing risk,
•  get allot of fees right off the bat.

it is literally corporate governance through post locale analysis of policy and the maintenance  of 'interest based' self categorization. it does slightly go against secular civility but should be acceptable.

making democracy work again

i can't tell the more technological ones but here are some involving voting and governance:

* rework democracy to have professional polling parties. holland has banks, another place should specialize in facilitating fair elections.

* rework democratic ballots so the governance is entirely bottom up. (get supporting math structure later called "fail conditions")

* facilitate easier ballot addendum to not require schmucks to get signatures via kick-starter style site allowing both donations and signatures for a cause. with a public running balance for nonprofit community improvement projects as well as the classic forecasted fundraising goal.

* international mandate for elections/voting weekly/monthly within countries claiming to be democratic to the UN. if nothing else is up to question, it is a satisfaction survey.

* greater government promotion of companies and allowance for government to compete with private industry when private industry is being ineffective. basically, large cities should have parking lots (perhaps requiring fees).

* separate ballots/articles for people running for office from the main issues and concerns of the people.  for example, every politician wants to fix the economy. you vote first on priorities and then later on vote on who you think can do it.

* multi layer disclosed governance goals by the lower leadership, or chosen by voters, with deadlines and the numbers used in finding the expenses. do we as a people want to go into space? fine. do we want to automate agriculture? fine. want to get renewable energy? fine... whatever the government wants to do the question remains- what can i mathematically grade 'your' performance on? if you have control, when will your proposal be done, how much risk is there it will go above cost? what is the break down of the cost structure by component? also in the grading of performance, part of the election should be choosing 'fail' criteria under which the elected person is ousted rendering impeachment quaint.

* add to ballots fail criteria based on campaign promises. it will replace and automate the impeachment process. allow additional fail criteria to be added to the ballot. in effect add short term measures/proposals which are only used for one electoral term.



* in the project proposal economic concerns should be taken into consideration including things like whether the government will pay continually or cash on delivery with adjustment for interest due to loans taken out, also where the money comes from.

* multiple pages on the individuals running including private investigator reports, and related work experience accounts by those who worked with him/her. bluntly a politician should be able to politick without being in office.



in essence, i want allot more control of what the government does, how it does it, how much it costs and greater precision in how much budget the reward is worth. put another way rather than voting for high speed rail: yea, nay. it would be better to vote "___ is the max worth of the project ($0 being in effect 'hard' nay, and price lower than projected expense being 'soft' nay). the money for the project comes from [list]. if proposal estimate isn't within ___% of the proposed price or ___% of max worth, there is breach of contract. making the rest of cost come from ____ .